PDA

View Full Version : Keith Urban and Dixie Chicks to open for Eagles in June!



sodascouts
03-16-2010, 01:18 AM
Check out the new tour dates here (http://eaglesonlinecentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/eagles-add-dates-in-other-parts-of.html).

It's cool (although I wish it were the Mac) but I wonder if this means a shortened setlist? And I wonder if there will be interaction between bands?

Wildthyme
03-16-2010, 01:23 AM
So it looks like the stadium tour thing is happening but just not with Fleetwood Mac? I would love to be able to go to one of these concerts since I am also a Dixie Chicks and Keith Urban fan.

AzEaglesFan
03-16-2010, 03:14 AM
All this time off must have really recharged their batteries. They aren't doing the one month touring and one month off.

Brooke
03-16-2010, 10:02 AM
I'm really shocked they are doing this. They don't need anyone to open for them and neither does Keith. They both sell out venues by themselves. :shrug:

But two of my true loves, together?! Amazing! :yay:

ETA: Why the DC? They are so over. (ducking and running....)

luvthelighthouse
03-16-2010, 10:25 AM
ETA: Why the DC? They are so over. (ducking and running....)

To help revive their career. :hilarious:

Ive always been a dreamer
03-16-2010, 10:51 AM
Okay - I've been doing some more investigating. The announcement is now up on the band's official site.

http://eaglesband.com/

Also found this which addresses the "how much" question. It's actually not as bad as I thought with prices topping out at $225 for this Meadowlands show ...

http://www.nj.com/entertainment/music/index.ssf/2010/03/eagles_dixie_chicks_keith_urba.html

TimothyBFan
03-16-2010, 11:22 AM
Well now my curiosity is aroused. I wonder if these will be the prices for all the shows. In Soldier Field, $50 & $85 wont be to awfully bad, besides it will be easier to plug my ears for the other acts (ducking & running -again) from a distance. And the South Shore train literally picks up 3 minutes from my house and drops right across the street at Soldier Field and only cost $20 round trip--probably cheaper than parking. Hmmmmm.....

Ive always been a dreamer
03-16-2010, 11:31 AM
Wilie - I'm gonna guess that the ticket prices at the other shows will be in line with these. All of the scheduled shows are in fairly comparable markets that have had about the same pricing for Eagles tickets in the past.

Go for it!

TimothyBFan
03-16-2010, 12:15 PM
Look what I found!!!!! Via 3Encores on Facebook!

http://www.fox2now.com/videobeta/ddbcf972-947d-4985-85f1-8d6527078911/Entertainment/Dixie-Chicks-Eagles-Concert

Glenn & Natalie on Fox video!!!

TimothyBFan
03-16-2010, 12:18 PM
Watch Glenn's hands during the interview. Acting like he's never done this before or something. :hilarious: Sounds like they are doing several interviews together.

Brooke
03-16-2010, 12:24 PM
:cool:

Sounds like they will be doing a shorter set though.

Good work TBF!

Ive always been a dreamer
03-16-2010, 12:29 PM
Awesome, Willie!!!

I imagine they will be doing similar interviews in some of the other markets as well (including tomorrow in Chicago). I noticed Glenn's fidgety hands too, Willie. He does that sometimes in interviews, which makes me think he's not really totally comfortable doing them. I also noticed Glenn's comment that they can't play 3 hours anymore. He said it half jokingly, but I suppose there is a bit of truth there. Hmmm - I wonder if that means anything for future tours???

ETA: There was no mention of Keith here since he won't be in St. Louis. So, it'll be interesting to hear what they may say about him tomorrow. I also noticed the question about whether or not they would appear on stage together, and Glenn says they hadn't talked about it. I think it was AEF who mentioned this in another thread - but, how awesome would it be for them to do Seven Bridges Road together!!! :nod: :nod: :nod:

tbs fanatic
03-16-2010, 02:14 PM
Oh no, Natalie has cut her hair short. :-(

Brooke, are you going to the St. Louis show? I don't think I'll be able to make it but it's sort of bubbling in the back of my mind.

EagleLady
03-16-2010, 02:17 PM
I love her hair short, Like it was in the Cowboy Take Me Away video

Freypower
03-16-2010, 06:24 PM
The only thing that concerns me here is if they can no longer play three hours, will there be an Asia/Australia tour? The whole thing sounds rather ominous. Will all the new songs just disappear?

He looks OK though. I think his hand gestures are expressive rather than nervous.

Brooke
03-16-2010, 07:22 PM
Brooke, are you going to the St. Louis show? I don't think I'll be able to make it but it's sort of bubbling in the back of my mind.

:shrug: It's bubbling in the back of my mind, too!

tbs fanatic
03-16-2010, 11:34 PM
LOL - let me know if anything bubbles to the front. Like - 'Yeah, I'm getting front row seats' :hilarious:

GlennLover
03-16-2010, 11:44 PM
The only thing that concerns me here is if they can no longer play three hours, will there be an Asia/Australia tour? The whole thing sounds rather ominous. Will all the new songs just disappear?

He looks OK though. I think his hand gestures are expressive rather than nervous.

I've seen him do other interviews where the interviewers were not in the studio & he did the same things with his hands.

Hope they make it to Australia, FP!

Ive always been a dreamer
03-16-2010, 11:57 PM
Yeah - as I said earlier, I've also seen other similar interviews, too. Whatever Glenn is trying to express comes across as nervousness or uneasiness. I think it is natural that some people don't really know what to do with empty hands, especially those who are use to having props such as guitars or cigarettes. I used to be that way when I first quit smoking. I would literally think to myself "Okay now, what do I do with my hands?" (Hmmm - sounds like that could be the title of a new song). :wink:

GlennLover
03-17-2010, 01:18 AM
http://i579.photobucket.com/albums/ss232/1Cdn/eaglestour2010poster.jpg

A better look at the new poster.

Freypower
03-17-2010, 02:11 AM
I don't know - perhaps he overdid the 'hands' thing slightly but he doesn't do this stuff often.

The new poster is nice (would go down well in Spain)! but the abrupt dropping of the LROOE moniker makes me uneasy, as I said. I knew it couldn't last forever but I had hoped it would come down here before it was dropped.

Koala
03-17-2010, 04:08 AM
FP, They are just playing a shorter set list, because they save their voices for their tour Asia / Australia! ;-) This I really hope for you! And then they play the of course normal LROOE tour! :-)

The 'hand thing' looked to me as if Glenn a bit nervous and he does not know what to do with his hands, as has been said already from Dreamer!

TimothyBFan
03-17-2010, 07:39 AM
I was thinking of this quite a bit last night, after telling my family they were coming to Soldier Field and hearing the moans as they contemplate who I will drag along if I decide to go. Several points I noted to myself...

1.) Extremely glad that they are hitting the shows out west by themselves so that those people that haven't gotten to see them yet on LROOE will get the full show (hopefully). BUT very sad that those in Asia/Australia (Julie) might not get so lucky the way it's looking.

2.) If my husband calls them "country" one more time, I'm divorcing him and that now he has fuel since they are touring with 2 well known country acts, which leads me into....

3.) I HATE the fact that they are touring with the Dixie Chicks!!!! Keith Urban I guess I can deal with but the Dixie Chicks? I will be honest, I really don't know all that much about them but what I have heard is so twangy/country I want to shoot myself! Maybe someone knows more about the connection they have with the DC and can fill me in on exactly why them?

4.) Since they are touring with other artists, as Glenn pointed out, the setlist will now be shortened and I cringe at the thought of what songs will now be eliminated! Probably no hope of ever hearing Glenn do any of his solo songs in the set and I'm sure Timothy will suffer elimination of one of his songs also. Just my opinion tho and hopefully I will be proven wrong.

In reading over this again, I guess all in all I'm not a bit happy with the change! Anyone else feeling this way besides me or am I alone in this?

Prettymaid
03-17-2010, 08:07 AM
I'm ambivalent about it too. While I'm glad they are doing a big month-long tour, The DC do not draw me in to it at all. To me they are has beens. Now I'm not into country much, but why not go with somebody who is really hot right now, like Lady Antebellum?

As far as Glenn's hand in the promo, my 81 year old dad has developed a habit of making a small circular motion with his index finger on the arm of the chair during conversation. He's been doing this for 15 years or more. When I saw Glenn's hand moving up and down his leg that's what it reminded me of.

eaglesvet
03-17-2010, 09:14 AM
Now, THAT would've been HOT---Eagles, Keith, and Lady Antebellum! :headbang: Definitely a lot more current, with all the airplay LA and Keith have been getting after their recent awards show exposure! There would be NO question on my going to the Meadowlands show if that were the billing. As it stands, I have to really think hard on spending that kind of $$$ on a night that I would have to take off from work (Thurs are my late night), to see one band I wouldn't consider seeing otherwise (DC), one band I love but have seen 3 times relatively recently, and one artist I love but am planning to see solo in the near future. Decisions, decisions...have to mull on it.

TimothyBFan
03-17-2010, 09:34 AM
I'm getting the vibe here that most of us are in agreement about DCs. While I would JUMP at the chance to go see them within an 1 1/2 hour away (cheap seats this time) for a 3 hour show of just them, I really doubt I will go with the other acts-especially because of the DCs. If we feel this way, how many other fans do also? And vice versa---how many KU and DC fans say I would go but I don't want to sit thru an Eagles set! :shock: I know, I know--hard to imagine but you know some out there are saying that!

Personally, I just don't get it. Fleetwood Mac just seemed to be a much better fit than this. I wonder how this all came about and how it all fell apart with FM. I hope we get some insight about how this came to be.

Brooke
03-17-2010, 10:46 AM
I really don't get the DC connection either. What are they trying to do with that? Do they really care about whether they have a career or not? They haven't done anything lately.

I loved the DC before Natalie opened her big mouth and then couldn't shut up. I just really loved their music and thought they were so different and talented. But she ruined it for me. I might listen to Martie and Emily in their new band, but not with Natalie.

I do (as you all know) love Keith, but like Ev said, I want all of him at a concert, not a shortened one. Same with the Eagles. I want the whole nine yards. I'm not really liking this whole deal. :shrug:

And as far as going, of course, I really, really want to. It's 2 1/2 hours away. But I want good seats if I go and I don't want to pay mega $$$.

I just want everything my way, don't I?! :scowl:

And Julie, I'm really feeling bad for you and all their fans down under. I'm praying this doesn't mean they aren't coming. Surely they will.

EagleLady
03-17-2010, 11:04 AM
^ They're still making Music, So I don't see how that is not doing anything.

Ive always been a dreamer
03-17-2010, 11:07 AM
My initial thoughts about this was that if the band was going to team up with other acts, I would have much preferred it to be Fleetwood Mac. However, even if that had happened, I still had mixed feelings - like most of us, I'd prefer to see a full show by the Eagles. I am also pretty ambivalent about the Dixie Chicks. I don't know a lot of their music, but I do think they are very talented. However, I would not go to them if they were playing alone. Now, although, I am not a fan of country music, thanks to Brooke, EasyFeeling, and my niece, I have become quite a fan of Keith Urban and his new brand of country rock. So I am actually pretty excited this. I am definitely considering going to one of the shows.

As far as the LROOE tour, I still believe that the guys will play Australia. They may make a few changes, but that's not unusual for them. I'm anxiously awaiting the upcoming arena shows in CA to see if they make changes (Hint Hint - uhh drop the suits guys, not the songs!) :wink:

Brooke
03-17-2010, 11:09 AM
El, they haven't toured nor put out any new music.

But really, it's just my opinion. :wink:

TimothyBFan
03-17-2010, 11:11 AM
It's funny you should post that right now EL. I was just doing a search and reading up on them to find out what's been done lately and according to Wiki, not a whole lot since 2008. And I quote....
"] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixie_Chicks#cite_note-87) [edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dixie_Chicks&action=edit&section=17)] Recent projects

A proposed April 2008 commercial spot to promote Al Gore (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore)'s "We Campaign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Campaign)" involving both the Dixie Chicks and Toby Keith (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toby_Keith) was eventually abandoned because of scheduling conflicts.
While the Dixie Chicks have been uniquely successful, other up-and-coming all-female bands that have been compared to them include the Canadian band Po' Girl (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Po%27_Girl), the Australian trio The McClymonts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_McClymonts), and the American trio The Shells (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shells_%28band%29).
Martie Maguire and Emily Robison will be releasing new music in 2010 without lead vocalist Natalie Maines. Lloyd Maines, Natalie's father, has stated that the trio are "definitely still an entity".On January 15, it was announced that duo will be known as Court Yard Hounds (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_Yard_Hounds) and will release an album in May with Robison on lead vocals.
On March 16, 2010, the Dixie Chicks announced they will be touring with music group The Eagles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eagles). The tour begins on June 8, 2010 in Toronto (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto), and has eight shows announced concert dates so far. The tour will be stadium-based, visiting cities such as Boston (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston), Chicago (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago), Philadelphia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia), Washington (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington), St. Louis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Louis) and Winnipeg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnipeg). Country singer Keith Urban (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Urban) will appear at selected concerts."


Sounds like 2 of them have plans to release new music but other than the big announcement the other day, notta!!!



IMO, DC's might benefit from touring with the Eagles (and I fear that is exactly why they are doing this) but again I ask, WHY are the Eagles doing this? I will repeat (and have already) again and again---it just doesn't make much sense to me. After filling venue after venue the last couple of years, why include anyone else on the bill?

EagleLady
03-17-2010, 11:15 AM
Anyone can edit Wikipedia But, You have me there :razz:

TimothyBFan
03-17-2010, 11:45 AM
Anyone can edit Wikipedia But, You have me there :razz:

Which is exactly why I research things before I post my opinion here and that I also went to their own website only to see that the last album they put out was in 2003, a live album and the last studio album was Home in 2002---8 years ago. And looking over the site, wasn't seeing much recently other than the fact that some of their music was apparently used in the Vancouver Olympics by a couple of the athletes (Bates & Samuelson).

What really p*ssed me off is when I brought up the site, I was greeted with a BIG Eagles Summer 2010 with special guest the Dixie Chicks (no mention of Keith) banner/poster before you can enter their site.

Do I seem a bit over the top about this whole thing? YES!!! I have a whole lot of questions about the whole thing and hope I hear the reasoning behind these guys teaming up.

Brooke
03-17-2010, 11:57 AM
Right there with you, Willie.

tbs fanatic
03-17-2010, 12:07 PM
I have to say I like the DC's and I especially like Natalie's voice. I wish they would put something new out. As far as The Eagles adding all these extra acts on ???????? I can, sort of, see them going with the DC's. They have worked with them before and are probably very comfortable with them but adding not one but two acts is just weird, weird, weird. :huh:

sodascouts
03-17-2010, 12:10 PM
Well, the guys are buds with Nataline Maines, so maybe they don't care that the Dixie Chicks are not "in" anymore. As far as fan reaction, their fans are probably rejoicing as the Chicks looked to be on the verge of breaking up. Wonder how much money it took to make this "fit into the schedule" of Natalie...

As Brooke says, Keith Urban fans probably will not appreciate the fact that his set will be significantly shorter and some may bristle at his "opening act" status.

COMPLETELY speculation, but what I think is that the guys decided they wouldn't tour unless it was a shorter set (ie, less strenuous for them) and thus they starting thinking about sharing the bill. Fleetwood Mac was approached as the logical choice for their demographic - the "Dream Pairing" indeed. For whatever reason, that fell through - perhaps because Fleetwood Mac are almost as big a name as the Eagles and it would truly be double billing, not "Eagles with Special Guest Fleetwood Mac." Um, no.

So, it didn't happen, but the guys still wanted a shorter set. What to do? These people are all managed by Azoff, the Eagles are friendly with the Dixie Chicks who have opened for them before, and Keith Urban is hot stuff. Plus, ever since LROOE was released, the Eagles have been courting the country crowd. This is just an extension of that.

When the possibility was a shared bill with Fleetwood Mac, I found the shortened set list acceptable (I know that not everyone felt the same way). Now, with one act that annoys me and one that is appealing on a certain level but who I would never pay to see solo... we lose out on that trade!

I guess the real question is - if it's this or nothing, are we going to accept it? Or would we rather they not tour at all? Because I think that's what it comes down to, at least at this point - and perhaps longer, depending on how lucrative this is. If they don't sell enough tickets, the guys might decide to suck it up and play for two and a half hours again. ;) I certainly hope they do that for the folks in Australia and thereabouts who haven't gotten to see a full LROOE show.

BTW, I don't really care about what Nataline Maines said at some London concert in 2003 - it's not like she called Bush Satan's child and went on and on - it was just a throwaway insult. Don made a similar throwaway diss on Bush at the Chicago show I went to in 2005 and, while I rolled my eyes and thought it was lame, it didn't affect my appreciation of his terrific music. I like the Chicks' version of Landslide, even if it doesn't approach the original. I just don't really think they're more than an alright country band and I certainly don't want them cutting into Eagles time - but again, this or nothing...

P.S. I am sitting in an airport right now and as I type, I am hearing a Madonna techno dance mix cover of End of the Innocence. I kid you not. TECHNO. My ears!! THEY BLEED!!!! MAKE IT STOP!!!!

TimothyBFan
03-17-2010, 01:00 PM
First and foremost I wish to apologize for the fact that I'm sure it seems that I have hijacked this thread this morning. While I'm suppose to be doing my books on the computer, I have indeed not, and instead have decided that I'd much rather "play" online instead!!:razz:



Wonder how much money it took to make this "fit into the schedule" of Natalie...


COMPLETELY speculation, but what I think is that the guys decided they wouldn't tour unless it was a shorter set (ie, less strenuous for them) and thus they starting thinking about sharing the bill.

Nancy--thanks for pretty much "mellowing" me out a bit. You said a lot of what I wanted to but have been to "fired" up to do so the right way, especially as eloquently as you have.

The two points I quoted above....1st--I wondered that same thing! Bottomline is $$$$$ 2nd--- My answer is a simple solution, one I'm sure not everyone would agree with---shorten the set if you feel you can't do a 3 hour show anymore and charge LESS $$$$!!! I'd still go. The solution they have decided on I will probably not settle for! The more I think about it (and it's obvious I have quite a bit) I really don't think I will be attending the Chicago show. Can't justify the $ for this one, even the cheap seat I would have gotten (gotta stay with my earlier convictions of NOT ever paying the high price again)! I just feel that the Eagles are "settling", if that's the right word.

Also, let me point out, I really don't mean to offend anyone who really likes the Dixie Chicks. They just aren't my cup of tea as I'm sure Dixie Chick fans aren't exactly appreciative of most of the artists I love.

And finally (I know, it's about time right?), for the record, I just hate it when any artist/actor/musician, takes time in their show to tell me their political views and tell me why mine aren't right. Whether I agree with them or not, when I buy a ticket for a concert, I want to see that artist sing/play, not get their political views. If I want those, I will see them at the next political event I attend! I've criticized Don for this in the past and I will again if it happens again. Which makes me wonder, will their be some of that at these concerts considering? Hmmm?

luvthelighthouse
03-17-2010, 03:20 PM
---shorten the set if you feel you can't do a 3 hour show anymore and charge LESS $$$$!!!

I was going to say the SAME thing! I honestly don't think some of them can sing that long anymore. If they have to shorten the set, shorten the price! Amen my sister!

Freypower
03-17-2010, 05:49 PM
I have never heard either the Dixie Chicks or my countryman Keith Urban (What does that say about me)? Not quite true - I once heard Not Ready To Make Nice in a fast food shop and I found it twee and shrill (and the phrase 'make nice' may be common in America but is totally unknown here - I would have said 'be nice' but anyway).

I would prefer the Eagles toured on their own. They do not need these acts and I absolutely cringe at the thought of what the shortened set will be (though I can guess, and I note the relevant thread which I will visit in a minute).

As people have said, I think they owe it to Asia and Australia to let us have the full LROOE tour. We have waited six years and to maybe have it all taken away from us is not a good feeling. I can tell you that I don't have much incentive to pay $500 plus for 90 minutes of material that I have already seen. I was already worried that the only new song Glenn would sing would be How Long. I am even more worried now, I hope unnecessarily.

AzEaglesFan
03-18-2010, 03:35 AM
Maybe now that Natalie's hubby is unemployed, she needs to earn some money. The DC have been off the road for awhile and like you said no new music either. I have seen the DC before and enjoyed them but I have never been able to see Keith Urban in person. I would like to see him but glad the show in Phoenix is just Eagles since it will be the first time I have been able to see them in person.

Brooke
03-18-2010, 09:59 AM
I put this in another thread, but it really should have been here. :confused:

Anyways, maybe the 'summer tour' will be just that, and the best we can do is hope for them to resume the Long Road Out of Eden World Tour this fall.

Fingers and toes crossed for you, Fp.

Ive always been a dreamer
03-18-2010, 12:24 PM
As people have said, I think they owe it to Asia and Australia to let us have the full LROOE tour. We have waited six years and to maybe have it all taken away from us is not a good feeling. I can tell you that I don't have much incentive to pay $500 plus for 90 minutes of material that I have already seen. I was already worried that the only new song Glenn would sing would be How Long. I am even more worried now, I hope unnecessarily.

Well, as I said before, my guess is that the guys will go over to Australia with the LROOE tour that will probably be modeled after the upcoming California shows. I sure hope so for your sake, FP.

However, as much as I hope you have the opportunity to see them, I am going to have to take issue with some of your comments. I always cringe whenever someone says that a band owes it to their fans to play for them or to release new material, etc. I'm sorry but I don't believe that the Eagles (or any band) owe their fans live performances. Of course, we all want them and are grateful for them, but the band is not obligated to do them, IMO. If they want to release new material, it behooves them to put out the best music that they are capable of making. Then, whenever they decide to sell tickets for a live show, they do owe it to their fans to give them their best possible performance. But beyond that, I just don't think I'm entitled to anything from these guys.

Freypower
03-18-2010, 06:03 PM
Perhaps 'they owe it' was the wrong phrase but when you have waited this long to see new songs you have never seen you can only feel disapppointed that you may never in fact see those songs performed live (and it isn't as if a DVD has even been released - if that had happened perhaps I wouldn't mind so much).

My point remains that no, they are not 'obligated' to play or release new material (although I was talking about playing new songs, not releasing them - I'm beyond hoping for anything else from them now), but as a consumer, neither am I obligated to pay over $500 to see exactly what I saw in 2004, and even then, I would NOT be seeing some of my favourites like NKIT, Tequila Sunrise and Already Gone.

ETA: I don't want this to sound so harsh. But I have been extremely patient, waiting and waiting and waiting. I will continue to be patient and hope that the 'summer tour' is just a one off and that there will be one more version of the 'LROOE tour' for this region.

Ive always been a dreamer
03-22-2010, 11:55 AM
Well, FP, I truly do empathize with the fact that you have had to wait so long between seeing your favorite band live. I GET that, I really do. I know how lucky we are in the states to have as many opportunities as we do to see them. And even then, sometimes we still want more. I guess that's just human nature.

However, some of what you say just seems contrary to me. Obviously, no one is obligated to buy a concert ticket to a show. However, if you decide to buy a ticket, you're not purchasing an entitlement to make the set list. All of us would like to hear certain songs, but no matter how many times fans bitch and moan, it's not going to matter. As we've already discussed on the board numerous times before, everyone has to make a choice - either go to the show and enjoy whatever the band decides to play or don't go. That's just a harsh reality that we have to accept.

Now, back to the summer shows, I have to say that I was very surprised at how little mention Keith got in Glenn and Natalie's recent promotional interviews. I think the only time he was mentioned was in the Boston clip. Am I the only one that thought this was odd?

TimothyBFan
03-22-2010, 12:15 PM
Now, back to the summer shows, I have to say that I was very surprised at how little mention Keith got in Glenn and Natalie's recent promotional interviews. I think the only time he was mentioned was in the Boston clip. Am I the only one that thought this was odd?

Yup sure did...

https://eaglesonlinecentral.com/forum/showpost.php?p=100744&postcount=66

sodascouts
03-22-2010, 12:29 PM
Maybe they're mad at him for skipping out on three of the shows! lol

luvthelighthouse
03-22-2010, 04:41 PM
KU is so much more relevant that the DC these days. Even Natalie said there are no plans for them to release new music... so I just don't get this at all. Guess the DC's need some cash and what better way than to travel w/the Eagles.

In any case, I heard the first radio commericial for this today. They did promote all three acts.

Brooke
03-22-2010, 04:46 PM
KU is so much more relevant that the DC these days. Even Natalie said there are no plans for them to release new music... so I just don't get this at all. Guess the DC's need some cash and what better way than to travel w/the Eagles.


Amen!

EagleLady
03-22-2010, 05:07 PM
KU is so much more relevant that the DC these days. Even Natalie said there are no plans for them to release new music... so I just don't get this at all. Guess the DC's need some cash and what better way than to travel w/the Eagles.

In any case, I heard the first radio commericial for this today. They did promote all three acts.


Um, I think they have plenty of cash. Maybe they are doing it just to stay relevant

Freypower
03-22-2010, 05:31 PM
Well, FP, I truly do empathize with the fact that you have had to wait so long between seeing your favorite band live. I GET that, I really do. I know how lucky we are in the states to have as many opportunities as we do to see them. And even then, sometimes we still want more. I guess that's just human nature.

However, some of what you say just seems contrary to me. Obviously, no one is obligated to buy a concert ticket to a show. However, if you decide to buy a ticket, you're not purchasing an entitlement to make the set list. All of us would like to hear certain songs, but no matter how many times fans bitch and moan, it's not going to matter. As we've already discussed on the board numerous times before, everyone has to make a choice - either go to the show and enjoy whatever the band decides to play or don't go. That's just a harsh reality that we have to accept.

Now, back to the summer shows, I have to say that I was very surprised at how little mention Keith got in Glenn and Natalie's recent promotional interviews. I think the only time he was mentioned was in the Boston clip. Am I the only one that thought this was odd?

Did I say I was 'purchasing an entitlement to make the setlist'? That isn't what I meant, but I think that my point about being a consumer who doesn't necessarily feel obligated to pay a huge amount of money to hear exactly the same songs again is valid. As you say - 'enjoy it or don't go'. I would enjoy it, I'm sure, but I also have to weigh up the pros and cons.

If I have any comment about the interviews it would be that Keith Urban is obviously being treated as the 'support' act, but this has led to the DCs being given far more prominence than they should have been.

sodascouts
03-22-2010, 05:32 PM
KU is so much more relevant that the DC these days. Even Natalie said there are no plans for them to release new music... so I just don't get this at all. Guess the DC's need some cash and what better way than to travel w/the Eagles.


Um, I think they have plenty of cash. Maybe they are doing it just to stay relevant

As the Eagles prove, just because someone already has cash doesn't mean they don't want to make some more!

Two of the Chicks are releasing new music so they are "relevant" in that sense (if new material = relevance).

I think it's as simple as the guys (especially Don) liking the Chicks and having worked with them before, so they grabbed them for this.

EagleLady
03-22-2010, 05:35 PM
I didn't say they didn't want to make more.

sodascouts
03-22-2010, 05:44 PM
Did I say I was 'purchasing an entitlement to make the setlist'? That isn't what I meant, but I think that my point about being a consumer who doesn't necessarily feel obligated to pay a huge amount of money to hear exactly the same songs again is valid. As you say - 'enjoy it or don't go'. I would enjoy it, I'm sure, but I also have to weigh up the pros and cons.

That's true. I don't think it's wrong for a fan to express disappointment in a set list, regardless of whether or not their ideal setlist is realistic.


If I have any comment about the interviews it would be that Keith Urban is obviously being treated as the 'support' act, but this has led to the DCs being given far more prominence than they should have been.Hmm, I hadn't looked at it that way, but you're right - the lack of attention given to Urban seems to imply he's not as important. That is really strange, because as it's been pointed out, Urban is a lot more popular than the Dixie Chicks right now. Still, as mentioned previously, he's not going to be at every show so perhaps it's wise not to emphasize him.

I wonder if this means that he'll do a shorter set than the DC? I hope not.

TimothyBFan
03-22-2010, 06:40 PM
If I have any comment about the interviews it would be that Keith Urban is obviously being treated as the 'support' act, but this has led to the DCs being given far more prominence than they should have been.

You've got that right and that really bothers me!!

I'm still shaking my head at the whole Dixie Chicks thing. I see your point Soda, regarding them working together and Don & Glenn being fond of them but seriously wonder if they considered that a lot of people simply don't like them or if they even care. I have really considered this and came to the conclusion that had it been Eagles/KU/ and DC's were not on the bill, I would probably bite the bullet and pull out a cheap seat (if I could stay strong) and go to this. But I just simply am not going because they will be performing! Period! There's one fan they will not get $$ from for this show-but I'm sure they simply say "oh well, someone else will buy her ticket". Know what I mean?

EagleLady
03-22-2010, 06:48 PM
I don't get why so many hate three women for their beliefs and their opinions

Ive always been a dreamer
03-22-2010, 06:55 PM
My point remains that no, they are not 'obligated' to play or release new material (although I was talking about playing new songs, not releasing them - I'm beyond hoping for anything else from them now), but as a consumer, neither am I obligated to pay over $500 to see exactly what I saw in 2004, and even then, I would NOT be seeing some of my favourites like NKIT, Tequila Sunrise and Already Gone.

FP, when you made this statement, the way I interpret it is that there is a direct correlation between your decision to buy a ticket and the set list that will be played. Now, of course, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this – it is certainly your right to do that. I also don’t think it’s wrong to express disappointment over a set list either. I’ve done it myself more than once. However, to me it seems like a contradiction to continously complain about having to wait so long for the band to come over there on one hand, and then turn around and complain that you may not even go to a show because of the set list.

I'm not trying to be argumentative, and you can certainly feel however you want to feel. Maybe it's just me, but all I'm saying is that I just don't get your logic here.

luvthelighthouse
03-22-2010, 06:59 PM
I don't get why so many hate three women for their beliefs and their opinions

I wasn't a DC fan prior to Natalie's comments. It is a good question though. I was thinking about this. No doubt, the DC's totally rubbed me wrong w/their comments... but Don could say the same thing and I'd let it go.

Some can speak out, others can't... and honestly, I have no clue way that is. :shrug:

ETA:... on the DC and their relevence... I could have easily swapped in "popular" ... I think someone else mentioned Lady Antibellum (sp?)... they would have been the relevant act to pick IMO. I can't see Don just liking the chicks... and knowing they haven't preformed together in years, just grabbing them up. There's something behind the scenes that we don't know about and probably never will. To me though, I'm sure it's monetary... JMO.

Freypower
03-22-2010, 07:08 PM
FP, when you made this statement, the way I interpret it is that there is a direct correlation between your decision to buy a ticket and the set list that will be played. Now, of course, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this – it is certainly your right to do that. I also don’t think it’s wrong to express disappointment over a set list either. I’ve done it myself more than once. However, to me it seems like a contradiction to continously complain about having to wait so long for the band to come over there on one hand, and then turn around and complain that you may not even go to a show because of the set list.

I'm not trying to be argumentative, and you can certainly feel however you want to feel. Maybe it's just me, but all I'm saying is that I just don't get your logic here.


I don't want to sound like I'm complaining. But I have to be honest about this. I'm torn, I really am, and that is the truth. I see both sides. The bottom line is I will probably go and see them, but I probably will not go to five shows this time.

Surely you can accept that it doesn't seem fair that my part of the world may be deprived of the show that everyone else has seen? You can tell me that I can do nothing about it all you like, but I have the right to express concern about it.

For all I know they may come here & play the LROOE set list, but I don't know that for sure.

TimothyBFan
03-22-2010, 07:31 PM
I don't get why so many hate three women for their beliefs and their opinions

It has nothing to do with their beliefs ---I simply don't like their music and have absolutely no desire to see them! Period.

Like I've said before--they are all (including Don) entitled to their opinions, doesn't mean I want to hear them --especially when I have paid to go see a concert not a political rally.

Ive always been a dreamer
03-22-2010, 07:38 PM
I don't get why so many hate three women for their beliefs and their opinions

If you go back through this thread, it is hardly an outlash of people hating three women for their beliefs and their opinions. Other than a few very tame comments about their politics, most of what I've read are people saying that they don't think the Eagles and Dixie Chicks are a good fit because of their music. And I would concur with this. I have nothing against the Chicks for their political views. However, the music that I am familiar with of theirs is a bit too country for my tastes. I also said before I think they are very talented - however, just not my cup of tea. I think Keith's music is much more in line with the Eagles.

sodascouts
03-23-2010, 03:36 AM
And don't forget that if you're not into the Chicks, you can always just leave during their set - take a bathroom break, get a drink, etc. That's what people did when JD and the Straight Shot opened for Don! :lol:

I'm one of those who finds it tiresome when singers start to preach at me from the stage. Some of these stars see it as their duty to try and evangelize the masses, I guess, but I seriously doubt any audience member ever changed their opinion due to a sermon-ette at a concert. Instead, the audience members who agree with you cheer, and the audience members who don't agree with you feel dissed and maybe even boo. Not much is accomplished other than fan alienation. The only positive, really, is for the rock star: he/she gets to feel that sense of self-satisfaction that comes whenever one voices one's opinion. (I should add here that some fans do feel personally validated if their beliefs align with their favorite rock star's. I wouldn't call that a "positive" though - it's rather pathetic.)

That said, if the music is good, I'll stay in my seat. Plus, it's impolite to boo. ;)

And I'll stay in my seat to watch the Dixie Chicks.

eaglesvet
03-23-2010, 11:36 AM
My hubby actually FINALLY heard about this on the radio last week, and said something about what happened to Fleetwood Mac?:hilarious: But then, I could tell he was interested in it BECAUSE of the Dixie Chicks. But I bet the price tag scares him off. We'll have to think about it before next weekend, though. Anyone know why they are still advertising DC, KU, + opener on some of the shows such as the Meadowlands...who is "+ opener?"

sodascouts
03-23-2010, 12:27 PM
Another thing - what if Keith Urban, the Dixie Chicks, and the Eagles all do Seven Bridges Road together? That would be INCREDIBLE!

A Keith/Eagles fan who I met in Chicago at the TBS show posted this YouTube video on the official Keith Urban message board (http://www.keithurban.net/forum/):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVzsDA08Tvk

Imagine that with the Eagles!

eaglesvet - the additional unnamed "opener" will probably be a local act.

Brooke
03-23-2010, 01:24 PM
Yeah, well, I still don't get why they are enamored with the DC. Like I said before, I LOVED them when they were popular. They were so trendy, hip, talented and beautiful and they can sing and play! Maybe there's something going on behind the scenes with them...........:shrug: Like the old days.....I'm just sayin'......I can't see the Eagles helping them out, so to say, to jump start their career...who did they ever help out as far as struggling artists go?

And there's no question that Keith is more popular. My goodness, his concerts are wild and crazy. I wonder how security will handle women jumping up on stage and running up to hug him during a song? The Eagles would have heart attacks if that happened at their show! Will security bend for Keith (cause that's the way he likes it) and then stiffen up for the guys? Should be interesting.

And I'll echo TBF here, when I go to a concert, I don't want to hear their political views. I want to hear the music. Much as I love Don, I don't care what he thinks politically. I want to hear him sing. Same for any other band I go see.

sodascouts
03-23-2010, 01:52 PM
Maybe there's something going on behind the scenes with them...........:shrug: Like the old days.....I'm just sayin'......
Huh?


I wonder how security will handle women jumping up on stage and running up to hug him during a song? The Eagles would have heart attacks if that happened at their show! Will security bend for Keith (cause that's the way he likes it) and then stiffen up for the guys? Should be interesting.I wondered about this with regard to Fleetwood Mac. Since there's a break between sets, what happens at Keith's shouldn't affect the Eagles. Still, they might tell security to keep people back during Keith's set just so that people don't feel like they can do it later when the Eagles are on. Remember, Keith is not the boss here. He has to do what the Eagles want regardless of whether or not he would do it that way at his own shows.


And I'll echo TBF here, when I go to a concert, I don't want to hear their political views. I want to hear the music. Much as I love Don, I don't care what he thinks politically. I want to hear him sing. Same for any other band I go see.I don't think I've ever heard ANYONE say they want singers to preach politics from the stage, although some will say they don't mind. There's a difference. The only exceptions are those who get some kind of personal validation from hearing the star espouse the viewpoints they agree with, as I said in an earlier post. Ironically, almost all of those same people would get pretty pissed off if the star was preaching a viewpoint they didn't agree with, so I call "hypocrite" on that anyway. Again, the only one who truly gets off on stage-preaching is the rock star.

EasyFeeling
03-23-2010, 01:55 PM
Brooke, interesting point. The way Keith performs is so different from the Eagles. I don't know where it was but once security tried to hold people back from rushing forward to come closer to the stage and Keith was so pissed off. He stopped singing and yelled at them to let people loose.

Prettymaid
03-23-2010, 05:43 PM
Are these concerts all going to be outdoors?

sodascouts
03-23-2010, 11:57 PM
I believe so, yes.

Prettymaid
03-24-2010, 08:07 AM
I think they would all be able to do their own style of show, ie Keith allowing fans near the stage is not going to effect the Eagles show being...well...the Eagles show.

TimothyBFan
03-24-2010, 08:17 AM
Another thing - what if Keith Urban, the Dixie Chicks, and the Eagles all do Seven Bridges Road together? That would be INCREDIBLE!



I'm sorry, but I totally disagree with this! I don't want to hear the DCs do 7BR! I think it would tick me off if they even try. Keith I wouldn't mind. I know it probably sounds strange, but I seriously don't know why I am so negative against these gals, but I genuinely have a dislike for them and don't want to see them with my beloved Eagles! :hilarious: And don't even start to think it's because they're woman and I'm jealous. I've already thought about that but can honestly say that I wouldn't care if it was, let's say, Heart for example. Wouldn't bother me a bit! :shrug: But NONE of them better lay a hand on MY Timothy!!! :-x :hilarious:


And there's no question that Keith is more popular. My goodness, his concerts are wild and crazy. I wonder how security will handle women jumping up on stage and running up to hug him during a song? The Eagles would have heart attacks if that happened at their show! Will security bend for Keith (cause that's the way he likes it) and then stiffen up for the guys? Should be interesting.

Second thought, this might be worth the price of admission just to see this! :hilarious:

Prettymaid
03-24-2010, 08:33 AM
I know it probably sounds strange, but I seriously don't know why I am so negative against these gals, but I genuinely have a dislike for them and don't want to see them with my beloved Eagles!

Could it be that you think they are hanging on to the Eagles' coat tails to nudge their pathetic careers along?

(Hey, I'm just asking if Willie feels this way - doesn't mean I do! :wink:)

TimothyBFan
03-24-2010, 08:40 AM
Like I said, I really don't know. Tho I think you have a very valid point (even if you don't feel the same way ;) :lie:) but why are the Eagles dragging them along if that's the case? I can think of dozens of artist not only more popular but more suited for them. JMO tho.

Prettymaid
03-24-2010, 09:16 AM
To be honest, I really don't think nearly as much thought went into this as we are making of it. Irving (or somebody) brought up the DC, and everybody said O.K.

Brooke
03-24-2010, 10:25 AM
Second thought, this might be worth the price of admission just to see this! :hilarious:

Believe me Willie. Keith is worth seeing. He's fantastic. :nod:

Oh, were you talking about the Eagles there? :lol:

And I don't get them picking the DC either. I just don't get it. :brickwall:

sodascouts
03-24-2010, 10:31 AM
Perhaps they just thought, "We've played with these girls before, they seem nice enough, they're country like Keith, Keith can't be there every show and we need someone to take the pressure off of us to perform a long set... let's take them on tour with us."

EagleLady
03-24-2010, 10:55 AM
I'd pay anything to see all three together anyways.

TimothyBFan
03-24-2010, 10:59 AM
Of course you would EL! You said you like them.

EagleLady
03-24-2010, 11:19 AM
But I understand not everyone is in love with them. It'd be a boring world if we all liked the same thing ;)

Ive always been a dreamer
03-24-2010, 11:19 AM
You know even though I'm not jazzed about the choice of the Dixie Chicks touring with the Eagles, I guess I don't feel as strongly about it as some of you. Even though they are a bit too country for my tastes, I don't think the two band's are a total mismatch. There are certainly a lot of other acts out there that are a lot more country sounding than the Chicks, and I do think they are very talented. I'm not really that familiar with a lot of their music, but I'm going to listen to some of it before I go to a show. They will certainly not keep me away because I am really jazzed about seeing Keith perform. And I'm with Soda - for me, it would almost be worth the price of admission just to see them all perform 7BR. :fainting:

Glennhoney
03-24-2010, 11:30 AM
...no,no,no....I can't bear them ALL singing 7BR...please don't do it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ive always been a dreamer
03-24-2010, 11:30 AM
Anyone know why they are still advertising DC, KU, + opener on some of the shows such as the Meadowlands...who is "+ opener?"

I'm wondering if this isn't a mistake. It may be that there will be another opening act for the shows that Keith is not going to play. I think there was a brief mention about this in one of the promotional interviews, but I don't remember which one. Anyway, unless they are planning on starting VERY early, I don't think there is time for a fourth act. As I said earlier, I would think Keith and The Dixie Chicks will each play somewhere between 45 minutes to an hour, and then our guys will probably play about 90 minutes. In any event, unless it's somebody REALLY good, I don't think I'll be rushing there to see an opening act.

luvthelighthouse
03-24-2010, 11:33 AM
How did we even come the the possiblity that 7BR may be performed by all the acts? I somehow missed this.

sodascouts
03-24-2010, 11:39 AM
That was my fault, LTL. Keith has done SBR in the past so I thought maybe... besides, it's a harmony-oriented song and one thing the Dixie Chicks have nailed is tight harmony. You gotta give 'em that. I still think it would be cool. Sure, hearing the Eagles do it themselves would be better, but I doubt that will ever happen again (although you never know).

Dreamer - some shows are starting at 5:30 or 6:00. The Meadowlands show starts at 4:30! I think there's time if you wanna get there that early. The local acts aren't usually on very long. The shows that start later though - I agree that the "+ opener" is probably a mistake for those shows, perhaps caused by a lack of differentiation between the shows that start early and the shows that start at the normal time.

Ive always been a dreamer
03-24-2010, 12:11 PM
Yeah - Soda posted a video of Keith doing the song with Sugarland. Here he is again doing it with Lady Antebellum. He certainly does justice to the song, so I think it would be awesome to hear him do it with the Eagles. Besides, it's a song that I have always wanted to hear the Eagles do live, so I would certainly be willing for them to share the spotlight here. IMO, it would be the perfect song for them if they are going to share the stage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3A5ZzBd2lPE&NR=1

And wow - I didn't realize that some shows are starting that early. If that's the case, I'm pretty sure that they would have an opening act. This will be like a mini-festival!

tbs fanatic
03-24-2010, 12:39 PM
To be honest, I really don't think nearly as much thought went into this as we are making of it. Irving (or somebody) brought up the DC, and everybody said O.K.

I agree.

sodascouts
03-24-2010, 12:48 PM
And wow - I didn't realize that some shows are starting that early. If that's the case, I'm pretty sure that they would have an opening act. This will be like a mini-festival!

Yep! For the curious, this is the breakdown, according to Ticketmaster/LiveNation:

Show - Start Time:
Toronto - 6:00 pm
East Rutherford - 4:30 pm
Foxborough - 8:00 pm
Philadelphia - 6:00 pm
Washington DC - 8:00 pm
Chicago - 8:00 pm
Winnipeg - 5:30 pm
St. Louis - 8:00 pm

Brooke
03-24-2010, 01:48 PM
Yeah - Soda posted a video of Keith doing the song with Sugarland. Here he is again doing it with Lady Antebellum. He certainly does justice to the song, so I think it would be awesome to hear him do it with the Eagles. Besides, it's a song that I have always wanted to hear the Eagles do live, so I would certainly be willing for them to share the spotlight here. IMO, it would be the perfect song for them if they are going to share the stage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3A5ZzBd2lPE&NR=1

And wow - I didn't realize that some shows are starting that early. If that's the case, I'm pretty sure that they would have an opening act. This will be like a mini-festival!

OMG! It would definitely sound fantastic! So, Keith already knows the song and I'm sure the Chicks could do it. It's a given. They must do 7BR together! :pray:

Now, Keith is not going to be in St. Louis. :cry: Bummer! I was nearly talked in to going! Well, I still might. :headscratch: I probably will. Time will tell.

sodascouts
03-24-2010, 02:27 PM
See how awesomely the Dixie Chicks harmonize with Stevie on "Landslide" for a special performance on VH1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fScZa8X4u2g

They could totally do SBR with the guys and Keith.

Of course, Stevie is amazing, as always. ;)

Brooke
03-24-2010, 02:53 PM
Yes, Stevie is always amazing.

Believe it or not, I'm feeling like I could possibly forgive the DC's! :shock:

TimothyBFan
03-24-2010, 03:39 PM
Believe it or not, I'm feeling like I could possibly forgive the DC's! :shock:


:shock: :nope: And I was so counting on you to stick with me on this one. I could be the lone wolf in this by the end of it. :hilarious:

sodascouts
03-24-2010, 03:52 PM
Never underestimate the magic of Stevie Nicks, TBF! ;)

TimothyBFan
03-24-2010, 04:05 PM
Oh- I would never underestimate Stevie--you should know that by now. She sounded great in that video but......

BTW--will also say I didn't hate the Keith & LA video of 7BR either. It was pretty good but doesn't mean I want the Chicks singing it with our guys.

GH --glad to know I'm not the only one feeling that way!

sodascouts
03-24-2010, 04:44 PM
Oh- I would never underestimate Stevie--you should know that by now.

Oh, I know, I was just teasing. But I never get tired of watching that video. They sound terrific together. Plus, in 2001, Stevie released the song "Too far from Texas" which also featured great harmony from Natalie Maines. I can't find it online so you guys can hear it, but I have listened to it many, many times, and I love it. So, keeping that in mind, I will go ahead and say...

While it's true that they aren't the greatest songwriters in the world, The Dixie Chicks can harmonize like nobody's business and the ladies can play as well as sing (the one on the fiddle is especially talented). In other words, they ain't so bad. ;)

Brooke
03-24-2010, 04:46 PM
:shock: :nope: And I was so counting on you to stick with me on this one. I could be the lone wolf in this by the end of it. :hilarious:

Man, I am dangling by a thread on this! But I just keep remembering how much I used to love the DC's!

I guess it's all about forgiveness! :wink:

I'm still not at all pleased with the prices though.

Prettymaid
03-24-2010, 07:34 PM
I'm still not at all pleased with the prices though.

Yes, I will not be attending any of these shows, so I guess it's all the same to me!

Freypower
03-24-2010, 09:52 PM
I'd pay anything to see all three together anyways.

EL, this aroused my curiosity. You once said in chat that you've never seen the Eagles live. Now you say you would pay to see all three acts together.

Are you saying that the Eagles on their own was never enough incentive for you to want to see them live? As I remember you said you couldn't afford to see them.

Are you considering going to see all three acts?

EagleLady
03-24-2010, 10:01 PM
EL, this aroused my curiosity. You once said in chat that you've never seen the Eagles live. Now you say you would pay to see all three acts together.

Are you saying that the Eagles on their own was never enough incentive for you to want to see them live? As I remember you said you couldn't afford to see them.

Are you considering going to see all three acts?


Sorry if I confused you. I only meant if I could, I would see all three acts. Even The guys by themselves

Prettymaid
03-25-2010, 10:56 AM
I've been watching the Keith Urban SBR videos with different artists and have come to the conclusion that it would be so cool for Keith to leave this in his show and say something like, "I have some very special friends here tonight who are going to help me with this next one..." and out come the Eagles! :yay::yay::yay:

Why it should happen: This would not only give the audience a sneak peak of the guys before they do their own set, it would make them appear accessable and humble, I think. The crowd would go wild!

Why it won't happen: Unfortunately, I'm afraid the Eagles would not agree to this because they would feel it would somehow lower them as the status of being the main attraction. But they would be wrong. When Joe came onstage before his set and played with JD and the Straight Shots at the IL State Fair the crowd loved it. It made him seem very humble and down to earth. Now I realize that Joe is not the Eagles, but as I stated, I think this would just make the crowd anxious for more. In fact, I should be on the planning committee for this show...:hmm:

Molly
03-25-2010, 10:57 AM
:shock: :nope: And I was so counting on you to stick with me on this one. I could be the lone wolf in this by the end of it. :hilarious:

Nope, Willie, I've got your back! :thumbsup:

Brooke
03-25-2010, 01:19 PM
I've been watching the Keith Urban SBR videos with different artists and have come to the conclusion that it would be so cool for Keith to leave this in his show and say something like, "I have some very special friends here tonight who are going to help me with this next one..." and out come the Eagles! :yay::yay::yay:

Why it should happen: This would not only give the audience a sneak peak of the guys before they do their own set, it would make them appear accessable and humble, I think. The crowd would go wild!

Why it won't happen: Unfortunately, I'm afraid the Eagles would not agree to this because they would feel it would somehow lower them as the status of being the main attraction. But they would be wrong. When Joe came onstage before his set and played with JD and the Straight Shots at the IL State Fair the crowd loved it. It made him seem very humble and down to earth. Now I realize that Joe is not the Eagles, but as I stated, I think this would just make the crowd anxious for more. In fact, I should be on the planning committee for this show...:hmm:

Pm, excellent idea and I vote for you! :thumbsup:

TimothyBFan
03-25-2010, 01:36 PM
PM -total agreement with you. Think it would be awesome for the guys to do that but also agree, I'm sure Hell Freezes Over before it happens.

Freypower
03-25-2010, 05:38 PM
'Accessible and humble'?

:stunned:

I love the Eagles as much as anyone, but neither of the above words apply to them on a collective basis.

I could not envisage them agreeing to be Urban's 'special friends'. They are the main act, not him. It would make more sense if he were to join them during their set.

Glennhoney
03-25-2010, 08:04 PM
..I know that very few of you will agree with me...but I REALLY don't want to hear anybody else but the EAGLES doing their songs...nor do I want to hear the Eagles doing any of Keith's or the DC's songs....with the cost of the tickets being what they are...let the guys do their own thing...I am obviously, not a big country music fan...and I really have no interest in seeing these country acts, but if this is what I have to do to see my boys..well I guess I'll put up with it....but PLEASE...no singing together...

EagleLady
03-25-2010, 08:04 PM
I think it would be awesome if they all sang together.

sodascouts
03-25-2010, 08:19 PM
I understand what you're saying, GH, but if they do songs which they wouldn't do otherwise, it's worth it to me. Something different, you know?

Freypower
03-25-2010, 08:26 PM
Yes, but the chances of it happening are about the same as the Eagles changing the setlist. They don't do this sort of thing. It's all very well to say 'you can't rule anything out' but experience suggests otherwise. The DCs and Urban are just support acts - not a collaboration. And I am with GH on this. I want to see the Eagles sing their songs, nobody else. None of this applies to me anyway as I won't see this tour.

*NB I know Glenn did not appear to rule out singing with the DCs. Quite honestly, though, if he had not been asked the question I doubt it would even have occurred to him.

Glennhoney
03-25-2010, 08:33 PM
..I'm still trying to decide if this is worth my flight out to Ontario, ticket price, motels, etc.......I'm thinking I will wait and see what the EAGLES alone will be doing late summer/fall........I could end up being very disappointed though...what to do, what to do?????????...I keep thinking of the excellent show I saw in Boston, summer of 2008....nothing will ever compare to that again since they "can't do 3 hour shows anymore"....which I totally understand, of course.......

Freypower
03-25-2010, 08:34 PM
..I'm still trying to decide if this is worth my flight out to Ontario, ticket price, motels, etc.......I'm thinking I will wait and see what the EAGLES alone will be doing late summer/fall........I could end up being very disappointed though...what to do, what to do?????????...I keep thinking of the excellent show I saw in Boston, summer of 2008....nothing will ever compare to that again since they "can't do 3 hour shows anymore"....which I totally understand, of course.......

I think you should go, because I can tell you what I expect they will be doing in your autumn.

They will be in Asia & Australia. 8):rolleyes::armed:

We HOPE.

Glennhoney
03-25-2010, 08:44 PM
..now THAT would be quite a trip....hope your wish comes true...

Ive always been a dreamer
03-26-2010, 11:32 AM
Sorry, GH - I'm with Soda here. I don't know if this will happen or not, but it is possible that all three acts will take the stage together at some point. If they do, what better song could there be for them to perform than 7BR? I would personally love to see it. I'm not saying it will hapeen, but it is certainly not impossible. We were discussing this in another thread not too long ago - even though the Eagles are known to stick to their set list during a show, they have been known to mix things up a bit at times in the past, especially for special shows.

EasyFeeling
03-26-2010, 03:15 PM
Wow :huh: I better should not come here anymore to read this thread. As a huge Keith fan it's not a great fun. Keith JUST an opening act :shock: He's quite successful with all what he's doing. It sounds like he's not entitled to do an Eagles song or worth to share the stage with them.

I bet many people go to the shows just to see him even the Eagles are the main act.

sodascouts
03-26-2010, 04:08 PM
Please don't be upset, EF! I didn't see anyone insulting Keith in the thread. In fact, many people complimented him. It's not an insult to say he is the opening act - that's what he signed up to be! I'm sure he considers it an honor to open for a band he respects so much, which is probably why he agreed to open for the Eagles despite the fact that he is a big name in country and doesn't need to open for anyone to sell tickets.

But you must remember that not everyone likes country music, so they might not wish to listen to him. That is just individual taste. It doesn't mean they think that Keith is unworthy, it just means that they don't like that kind of music. Plus, some Eagles fans don't want ANYONE to sing with the Eagles - that has nothing to do with Keith personally.

Glennhoney
03-26-2010, 04:33 PM
..thank-you Soda :grouphug:

EasyFeeling
03-26-2010, 04:59 PM
I do not consider him as a country musician, in fact I don't like country music. The Girl From Yesterday sounds more country than any Keith song. But I don't want to discuss what's country and what's not.

You're right, Nancy, no one did insult him. I was just a little bit sad because I would love to see my two favorites doing a song together. I better stay away from this thread from now on :smile:

sodascouts
03-26-2010, 05:05 PM
I understand, EF - but again, I think many appreciate Keith's talent here! I could watch those videos of him again and again.

Freypower
03-26-2010, 05:13 PM
Sorry, GH - I'm with Soda here. I don't know if this will happen or not, but it is possible that all three acts will take the stage together at some point. If they do, what better song could there be for them to perform than 7BR? I would personally love to see it. I'm not saying it will hapeen, but it is certainly not impossible. We were discussing this in another thread not too long ago - even though the Eagles are known to stick to their set list during a show, they have been known to mix things up a bit at times in the past, especially for special shows.

But Dreamer, these aren't 'special shows'. They are Eagles shows which happen to have two support acts.

Ive always been a dreamer
03-26-2010, 05:22 PM
EF - I know I sure appreciate Keith's talent and a lot of the reason is because of you. I am very excited about the opportunity to see Keith and the Eagles together, and, as I said, I would love it if they shared the stage together for a song or two. I also agree with you that Keith's music is more what I call country rock. But to expand on what Soda said, I do think most people think of Keith as country. Even though Keith is opening for the Eagles, I don't look at that as a bad thing. IMO, since the Eagles attract audiences with such a wide spectrum of musical tastes, I think this will give Keith some exposure to some people that may have never come to see him otherwise. Once those people see and hear him perform, I'm convinced they will become fans. The same thing could also happen for the Eagles, but probably to a much lesser extent since they have been around for ummm ... like forever. :wink: I know that you and Brooke (and my niece) encouraged me to give Keith's music a listen, and once I did, I sure was sold! :thumbsup:

Ive always been a dreamer
03-26-2010, 05:25 PM
But Dreamer, these aren't 'special shows'. They are Eagles shows which happen to have two support acts.

Well sorry, FP, but I guess we see this differently. To me, an Eagles show which happens to have two support acts is a special show. A normal Eagles show does not include opening or support acts.

Freypower
03-26-2010, 05:27 PM
Yes, Dreamer. I will bow out now. But this is an entire TOUR. :confused:

EasyFeeling
03-26-2010, 05:40 PM
Well sorry, FP, but I guess we see this differently. To me, an Eagles show which happens to have two support acts is a special show. A normal Eagles show does not include opening or support acts.

I agree with you, Dreamer. Usually Keith do not open for someone so I consider this as a special show.
I really don't know why people think of Keith as country. :shrug: The songs from the first albums were country but his music changed over the times. You are so lucky to see them in one show. I'm sure you will be thrilled if you see Keith live.

Freypower
03-26-2010, 06:07 PM
I'm sorry, EF, but facts are facts, and on this tour Keith Urban is the opening act. I don't see how you can describe it any other way.

I realise I am in a minority here but not only do I fail to see why the Eagles should perform songs with the support acts, I fail to see why people want them to do this. :doh:

sodascouts
03-27-2010, 12:41 AM
I don't think Michaela was claiming that Keith wasn't opening for the Eagles. In fact, she said:


Usually Keith do not open for someone so I consider this as a special show.

And I agree with Michaela that the tour is "special" in terms of the fact that something like this hasn't been done by the Eagles in recent memory, even though it's not on par with a one-time-only event.

Freypower, since at this point we all recognize Keith's status in the line-up, I think it's unnecessary to keep re-emphasizing that the Eagles are headlining.


not only do I fail to see why the Eagles should perform songs with the support acts, I fail to see why people want them to do this. :doh:

I as well as several other people have already stated reasons why we think it would be a good idea for the acts to perform a song or two together. You have every right to disagree, but to completely dismiss the viewpoint as incomprehensible is a bit much. You're an intelligent woman. Surely you can follow the logic of our argument even if you don't agree with our conclusion.

Oh well. I guess we'll see what happens with the tour - should be interesting!

Freypower
03-27-2010, 02:01 AM
I'm sorry if all the above was negative. That wasn't the intention.

The only reasons I saw expressed by people who want this to happen is 'it would be different' especially if they did songs they wouldn't normally do, and PM said if the Eagles came out with Urban the audience would have a 'sneak peek' at the Eagles and that the Eagles would appear 'accessible and humble'. I don't agree with those sentiments and so yes, I suppose I failed to comprehend them.

Really, if this is what people would like to see, I hope that you get your wish.

luvthelighthouse
03-27-2010, 10:26 AM
Personally, I feel different would be good. The Eagles are so predictable, it would be nice to see them mix it up in any way. I mean, come on, we get so excited it they add it once line of ASWTDID or add an encore. Hardly earth shattering changes. We all know 95 % of the songs we will hear, since they don't really change up their set list. (again, except adding deleting a song occassionally)

Now, please don't take that as complaining. Clearly people see them time and again knowing it's the same set list... but yes, tossing in another act for a song or two would be different and fun, IMO.

While KU can tour on his own and fill arena, he can't fill stadiums. Stadium shows are huge money makers. I'm sure he's more than happy to be a part of this summer tour as an opening/support act. If not, he probably wouldn't it.

Prettymaid
03-27-2010, 12:11 PM
'Accessible and humble'?
:stunned:
I love the Eagles as much as anyone, but neither of the above words apply to them on a collective basis.

I agree. That's why I said it would make them appear to be. That would be a good thing, wouldn't it? :shrug:

I guess I don't understand how not agreeing with something automatically makes it incomprehensible. I'm not sure how I feel about the Eagles touring with country acts, but I can understand that many people would love it.

ETA: I love the Eagles. Although I appreciate that they have been around for years and are the best American band of all time, I don't necessarily want them placed on a pedestal to make them seem like they are too good to perform with other artists.

Ive always been a dreamer
03-27-2010, 07:19 PM
I love the Eagles. Although I appreciate that they have been around for years and are the best American band of all time, I don't necessarily want them placed on a pedestal to make them seem like they are too good to perform with other artists.

Exactly PM! ITA.


I realise I am in a minority here but not only do I fail to see why the Eagles should perform songs with the support acts, I fail to see why people want them to do this.

FP, even though it might not be what you intended, some people may interpret such unqualified statements as an elitist attitude. I, myself, have said before that I believe the Eagles are America’s greatest band ever and that they are in an elite group with only a few other artist, and I stand by that statement. However, that does not mean that I believe that they are beyond reproach or that it would be beneath them to take the stage and share a few songs with other acts as your remarks suggest. Actually, in light of the fact that the band is prone to stick with the same set list in their shows, I would welcome them doing something different like this with open arms. Like Soda, while I'm not going to get my hopes up, I'm also not going to say it's impossible.

Freypower
03-28-2010, 05:40 PM
OK, thanks for being so understanding, because I know I came across as very inflexible.

My objection or incomprehension is not so much to the Eagles performing with their support act - but ANYONE doing it. If anyone could give me an example of an incident where the main act has suddenly appeared on stage during the support, or vice versa then please let me know. I wasn't trying to put the Eagles on a pedestal out of reach of other acts. After all, they performed with Michelle Branch at the MS Benefit.

However, please remember their attittude at the Grammy Awards, where they insisted on closing the show and point blank refused to join in the traditional jam with the other inductees.

I've seen collaborations such as when I saw Bob Dylan with Tom Petty & the Heartbreakers. There were sets by each act & then they performed together. Such was the case with Elton John & Billy Joel & indeed with Don Henley and Stevie Nicks. But the main act appearing with the support? I've never heard of such a thing happening.

Prettymaid
03-28-2010, 06:10 PM
Well, I'm the one who suggested the Eagles come on with Keith Urban. I think mostly everybody else is thinking of the DC joining the Eagles on stage.

EasyFeeling
04-04-2010, 10:23 AM
http://www.theboot.com/2010/04/02/keith-urban-dixie-chicks-eagles-tour/


"To grow grow up listening to all the Eagles records ... to be a huge Don Henley fan, Joe Walsh fan, Glenn [Frey] and all the boys ... it's phenomenal," Keith gushes. "I'm so thrilled to play on these shows, and I wish we could do more of them!"

AzEaglesFan
04-04-2010, 09:53 PM
So now we have it direct from the horse's mouths, Keith Urban and The Dixie Chicks consider themselves the Eagles opening acts. We had no doubt that this was the case but it is good to hear it from them. Can hardly wait to see who does what songs. I hope that Keith gets them to do Seven Bridges Road but I don't remember what song the Eagles sang with the Chicks.

GlennLover
04-04-2010, 10:09 PM
I hope that Keith gets them to do Seven Bridges Road but I don't remember what song the Eagles sang with the Chicks.

Other than Desperado, neither do Glenn or Natalie :laugh:!

bernie's bender
04-05-2010, 04:30 PM
The concert biz has been pretty tough for a lot of people for a long time.

some classic bands just end up constantly being billed on farewell tours to bring out the old fans one last time....

I'd guess that there are several elements to why these three and why now... 1) I haven't looked but their may be some connection in management. In the 70's sometimes you'd see the Eagles and the openers would be, sheesh, toots and the maytals! reason: shared management/bookers. I've experienced several weird bills in my life that were pretty much because the booker could double down.

reason 2: cross marketing. The Eagles need more 'in' to a younger audience and a more country audience, Keith Urban would like to be heard by a more 'Rock' audience and the Chicks has an audience on both sides, but because of controversy, they need to be 'made whole' again by a legit country artist like Urban and a longtime band who shares most, if not all, of their politics... it will get the Chicks into the bigger venue where they can grow into some lost markets and expand into the 50 something audience of casual listeners. It makes sense and should work well for all three to grow for their NEXT tour.

it was suggested I make the connection between the chicks and the eagles...

Lloyd Maines (Natalie's dad) was helpful to Shiloh (if you remember Kenny Rogers was really helpful to Henley and Richard Bowden and those guys in the beginning) Lloyd played with Kenny for years etc and Lloyd is old friends with those guys....

it is a small, small world.

Some folks wanna stay mad at the chicks... have at it! I have found staying mad about stuff takes more energy and does less good than the investment, but each to their own.

I watched the electric horseman (a movie starring robert redford, jane fonda and willie nelson) a couple of weeks ago with my mom's husband (he's 88 years old) and he loved the movie. I'd seen it several times and asked, "Keith, did you see this movie when it came out?" and he shook his head no and said, "I hated Jane Fonda so much (for her anti vietnam war stance) that I wouldn't go see her movies."

And I said, "Why were you willing to watch it today?" he just laughed and said, "I got over it." and we both just laughed.

eaglesvet
04-05-2010, 11:02 PM
Having only been converted to Keith's music by a couple of fellow Borderers a little over a year ago, I would classify his current style of music as more country-rock than the DC, that's for sure. And if you just look at the selections on his latest album, "Defying Gravity," there are songs that are not country at all---some pop leanings, some rock. Beautiful! :rockguitar::thumbsup:

jdubfan
04-22-2010, 03:36 PM
I'm crossing fingers,toes, tatas, etc hoping to go to chi. I can't remember Joe's actual quote while touring w/Kenny Chesney, but he said the country scene reminded him of how rock was in the beginning (70s) and the crowds and the excitement beat anything that was going on in the current rock scene. Maybe the Eagles feel retro is the new, back to the future "California Rock" scene.

Ive always been a dreamer
05-22-2010, 11:57 AM
Well, with the cancellation of three of the originally scheduled shows for this tour, we are down to only six shows. Keith Urban is only scheduled for three of them, so those of you who can get to one of those shows are in for a rare treat apparently. The Washington, D.C., Hershey, PA., and Philadelphia, PA. shows have all been cancelled. The shows that are still on are:

Toronto, CA (Dixie Chicks but no Keith Urban)
East Rutherford, NJ (Keith Urban and the Dixie Chicks)
Foxboro, MA (Keith Urban and the Dixie Chicks)
Chicago, IL (Keith Urban and the Dixie Chicks)
Winnipeg, CA (Dixie Chicks but no Keith Urban)
St. Louis, MO (Dixie Chicks but no Keith Urban)

We were beginning to speculate in another thread as to why these shows are being cancelled, and, of course, none of us know the reason for sure. Could have been a variety of reasons such as low ticket sales, problems with the promoters, logistical problems with the venues or artists, or any number of other things.

It seems strange to me if the problem was low ticket sales because the Eagles aren't having to cancel shows where they are appearing solo. Keith Urban also seems to also be doing alright with his ticket sales. So to continue the speculation, I wonder if this was just the wrong combination of acts that fans just didn't go for. Personally, I think the Eagles and Keith were a good match up. I wonder if the Dixie Chicks are what hurt them here. I'm curious about what others think about this. Is the Dixie Chicks backlash still going on or is there some other reason for the cancellations?

EagleLady
05-22-2010, 12:18 PM
Maybe the Other Two Chicks have to promote their CD, But I don't think that would be it.

timfan
05-22-2010, 12:29 PM
well something intersting about the toronto show and ticket sales.. I have been watching the ticket sales for a few weeks ( waiting for the good seats to go on sale) and over the last five days when i have put in the same request for tickets (single ticket, best available) the EXACT same ticket came up. Well this morning just to torture myself ( as i am now unable to go to the show) I checked again... and the same ticket is STILL coming up as the best available!! So it seems to me ticket sales for toronto aren't going that well.. IMO

FeedTheFire
05-22-2010, 03:48 PM
Lots of speculation on the KU site.............I know the Eagles never have problems with their ticket sales so maybe it is the line up...........I know a lot of folks have had problems with the Dixie Chicks for some type of political reasons.

Brooke
05-24-2010, 09:57 AM
I'm planning to go the the St. Louis show, but haven't bought my ticket yet either. I've also been watching to see what I can get and have been slightly surprised that decent seats are still available, too. Now I'm wondering. A friend that is planning to go with me didn't really want to see the DC either, but we were going to anyway. :headscratch:

Maidstone
05-24-2010, 02:32 PM
So Dixie Chicks and KU are not opening for Eagles in Dallas on June 26th. Right?

They aren't listed on the official Eagles Website tour dates.

Sorry to any DC/KU fans, but I really just want to see the Eagles. Performing alone. For 4 -5 hours.

Is that wrong of me?

:partytime:

sodascouts
05-24-2010, 04:57 PM
Well, with the cancellation of three of the originally scheduled shows for this tour, we are down to only six shows. Keith Urban is only scheduled for three of them, so those of you who can get to one of those shows are in for a rare treat apparently. The Washington, D.C., Hershey, PA., and Philadelphia, PA. shows have all been cancelled. The shows that are still on are:

Toronto, CA (Dixie Chicks but no Keith Urban)
East Rutherford, NJ (Keith Urban and the Dixie Chicks)
Foxboro, MA (Keith Urban and the Dixie Chicks)
Chicago, IL (Keith Urban and the Dixie Chicks)
Winnipeg, CA (Dixie Chicks but no Keith Urban)
St. Louis, MO (Dixie Chicks but no Keith Urban)

We were beginning to speculate in another thread as to why these shows are being cancelled, and, of course, none of us know the reason for sure. Could have been a variety of reasons such as low ticket sales, problems with the promoters, logistical problems with the venues or artists, or any number of other things.

It seems strange to me if the problem was low ticket sales because the Eagles aren't having to cancel shows where they are appearing solo. Keith Urban also seems to also be doing alright with his ticket sales. So to continue the speculation, I wonder if this was just the wrong combination of acts that fans just didn't go for. Personally, I think the Eagles and Keith were a good match up. I wonder if the Dixie Chicks are what hurt them here. I'm curious about what others think about this. Is the Dixie Chicks backlash still going on or is there some other reason for the cancellations?

I think it probably is indeed due to low ticket sales, but I think that's due to the price of tickets in this economy. I don't think it's the political beliefs of the Dixie Chicks that are keeping people away; I think it's the fact that tickets top out at over $200. What you can get for tickets in Chicago doesn't necessarily translate to Pennsylvania.

I just hope these are the last of the cancellations. I remember when Don Henley and Stevie Nicks toured in 2005 - ticket sales were not the greatest, and they wound up only playing 10 shows. I forget how many shows were canceled, but it was more than a couple.

Keith Urban and The Dixie Chicks have their audiences, but they are not the kind of draw that the Eagles are. Maybe if the Eagles had paired with a powerhouse like Fleetwood Mac as was originally rumoured, the shows would be selling better. Keith Urban and the Chicks just aren't an acceptable substitute for half an Eagles show in the minds of many Eagles fans, and I think the ticket sales reflect that.

I'll still take it over nothing, though.


So Dixie Chicks and KU are not opening for Eagles in Dallas on June 26th. Right?
Right.

TimothyBFan
05-25-2010, 08:04 AM
Larry listens to a lot of talk radio, especially out of Chicago and he told me that on the Chicago station he was listening to yesterday (I believe he said WGN) they were talking about the concert at Soldier Field and that there were LOTS of tickets still available. The DJ went so far as to make comments along the line as knowing the Eagles can sell but how about the other acts with the Eagles?

Brooke
05-25-2010, 10:00 AM
Well, Keith can sell out a venue by himself. I've been there. So I don't really understand the slow ticket sales at the shows where he's there. DC, not so much.

Sadly, he's not at the St. Louis show. :cry:

Maidstone
05-25-2010, 03:12 PM
I've received three emails today from TicketBastard/Live Nation, Toyota Ctr in Houston and from American Airlines Ctr in Dallas saying they have extra tickets just released for these three concerts:

Taylor Swift (Toyota Ctr)
Michael Buble (AA Ctr) over 700 seats available now just released for a July concert
Chicago/Doobie Bros tour: sale of 2 for 1 seats for this summer - many venues listed from this email

Meaning there are a lot fewer of us going to see concerts this year.

I just thought that was interesting I got bombarded today with emails re: concert tickets for sale.
Maid

TimothyBFan
05-26-2010, 08:15 AM
Chicago/Doobie Bros tour: sale of 2 for 1 seats for this summer

Maid

This got my attention!! I would be at a hell of a lot more shows if more acts did that! I wonder if it's any seats in the venue or just select sections.

sodascouts
06-07-2010, 09:28 PM
I went out and bought Keith Urban's Greatest Hits in preparation for seeing him with the Eagles. I agree with those who've sung his praises - this guy is good! I'm just sorry he won't be at all the shows.

Ive always been a dreamer
06-07-2010, 09:37 PM
Told ya, Soda! :wink:

luvthelighthouse
06-07-2010, 10:09 PM
Is anyone going to Chicago? I still haven't bought tix and I'm still not sure! I have other plans that night, but I could easily get out of them. I'm just not itching to pay those tix prices.

I haven't even listened to the guys in about at week... but I'm listening now and I'm thinking... how can I NOT go? They are SO awesome! Just not loving the stadium idea.

sodascouts
06-08-2010, 12:54 AM
Told ya, Soda! :wink:

True, but the first person to introduce me to Keith was EasyFeeling - it's just that it was nice to get re-acquainted with Mr. Urban. ;)

Brooke
06-08-2010, 10:06 AM
I went out and bought Keith Urban's Greatest Hits in preparation for seeing him with the Eagles. I agree with those who've sung his praises - this guy is good! I'm just sorry he won't be at all the shows.

This guy is fantastic! Good for you Soda! You will love it! :thumbsup: Will he be at the shows you are going to?

sodascouts
06-10-2010, 06:39 PM
yes, he will! I'm excited to see him!