Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
Regarding the "they should recognize Glenn more during the show" topic...
Honestly, for me, it's a moot point. They shouldn't be out there at all under the "Eagles" banner, so I'm not going to be happy no matter what they do.
Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sodascouts
Oh, here we go again. This thread is for the people who don't agree with the band re-forming without Glenn. Posts that are not about that are off-topic and will be moved. I have already moved redstorm's.
I don't get why people who don't feel that way about the band are reading this thread.
ETA: If problems persist with the poster obviously deliberately ignoring the purpose of the thread with intent to troll, I will stop moving the off-topic posts from this thread and start deleting them instead.
I was criticized in this thread so I responded in this thread.
Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
I thought that might be your defense, but even you admitted her description didn't really fit you!
Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sodascouts
I thought that might be your defense, but even you admitted her description didn't really fit you!
I most certainly did not. Where exactly did I do that, Soda? I KNOW that it was directed at me because I had just posted how much I had enjoyed the song in the Nashville concert thread. It was a snide remake and I am not surprised that you are defending it.
Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
redstorm1968
I most certainly did not. Where exactly did I do that, Soda? I KNOW that it was directed at me because I had just posted how much I had enjoyed the song in the Nashville concert thread. It was a snide remake and I am not surprised that you are defending it.
Here's what I mean. Freypower commented upon the "irony" that those who "criticised Glenn's performance" of TITTL now sing the "praise of Gill's performance."
You replied: "I suppose you mean me, since I mentioned that I loved Vince's version of the song in the concert thread." BUT, you go on to say that "I don't remember ever criticizing Glenn Frey for singing that song" before continuing your critique.
Thus... you admit that FP's description does not entirely apply to you. You meant it as a criticism of her, not realizing that actually, it problematizes your assumption that she was talking about you.
Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
You can spilt a hair 17 ways.
Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
Well, only she knows who she was talking about, so perhaps I should not speak for her. I stopped reading the review threads. I don't see the point in torturing myself that way. I only read them if drama gets reported to me and I have to go in and deal with it. Lots of professional reviewers hated on Glenn's version of TITTL and praised Vince Gill, so there were certainly many people to whom she could have been referring. If she was criticizing you, then I can see your point. I just don't know if she really was.
We should not criticize other posters in here where they cannot defend themselves. This is not a thread designed to bash other posters (we should not be doing that regardless, anywhere on the board). This is a thread for criticizing the decision to continue the Eagles without Glenn.
Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sodascouts
Well, only she knows who she was talking about, so perhaps I should not speak for her. I stopped reading the review threads. I don't see the point in torturing myself that way. I only read them if drama gets reported to me and I have to go in and deal with it. Lots of professional reviewers hated on Glenn's version of TITTL and praised Vince Gill, so there were certainly many people to whom she could have been referring. If she was criticizing you, then I can see your point. I just don't know if she really was.
We should not criticize other posters in here where they cannot defend themselves. This is not a thread designed to bash other posters (we should not be doing that regardless, anywhere on the board). This is a thread for criticizing the decision to continue the Eagles without Glenn.
Thank you for that, Soda. I will retreat once again to the other threads.
Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chaim
I gotta say that it's easier for me to talk about my feelings about the current band now that it's been made clear several times who(m) this thread is for. I don't post a lot in internet forums, and when I do I don't have the energy to try and defend how I feel over and over again. I want to thank the people who kept fighting to keep this thread as a "no Glenn, no Eagles" zone. Austin, for example.
Thank you, chaim. I will never stop fighting for what I feel is right.
I must have to thank Soda for creating it and moderating it though.
Re: For Those Saying Glenn Frey is Necessary to the Eagles; no Glenn, no legit Eagles
I agree Austin, Soda is doing an immense job administering this board through all the controversy in this and other threads. I know where I stand with this issue, and like Soda I don't even read the threads of the 'New' Eagles because I just cant drum up enough interest to....