-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thelastresort
Is this the same Don Henley who made a living off preaching about the evils of money, arrogance and greed; and espousing the glories of Thoreau's steadfast observation of simplicity and humility? If the blatant hypocrisy didn't amuse me so much I'd probably cry.
Charging $7,000 for essentially a greatest hits tour, plus two songs they haven't played in deacdes and another two that fall in and out of the setlist (The Last Resort and TALA, Wasted Time and VOL respectively), featuring 40% of those who featured on it not even playing the same contributions the made (e.g. Henley on drums for any of it, or Joe's keyboards throughout), and only one half of the most famous dual guitar soloists ever. You see the same thing in sports, the offerings completely going over the heads of those who would die for the participants, all because you can make more money out of gormless morons who couldn't care less if they were at a boxing match or an orchestra.
I couldn't agree more TLR. Henley can be very preachy (too much for my tastes at times especially on LROOE) and at times, hypocritical. I think when David Geffen called him a malcontent I'd say he was spot on. I love his voice and I think he's a brilliant songwriter. I just don't always agree with his viewpoints and I don't think I'd want to associate with him or meet him. Which is sad, because I love his Eagles and solo music.
It truly boggles my mind some people aren't seeing what we are seeing. Maybe they don't want to think of it that way on purpose. But it's so shameless that it's like they aren't even trying to hide it anymore.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thelastresort
Is this the same Don Henley who made a living off preaching about the evils of money, arrogance and greed; and espousing the glories of Thoreau's steadfast observation of simplicity and humility? If the blatant hypocrisy didn't amuse me so much I'd probably cry.
From Thoreau's "Life without Principle" (1863):
"I think that there is nothing, not even crime, more opposed to poetry, to philosophy, ay, to life itself, than this incessant business."
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Hi everyone, it's been a while. I hope you're all well! I've been busy with kids and work, but think about the Eagles and you all. I just saw this thread - I don't understand the absolutely insane ticket prices. I do see a pretty nice seat in section 10, row T, seat 1 for $550. It's not down front, but its a good enough seat. I looked at Lady Gaga's residency shows in October at the MGM, in a different venue, the WORST seat in the house starts at $818, and she has a lot of shows. This is not a defense of Eagles pricing, again, I don't know how they arrive at the numbers. Gaga's prices are extreme, $11K for a front row seat.
Edited to add: someone in this thread said something about maybe them testing out a residency - that's a good point. I mean, at this price point, these "events" are not for fans of the band, they're for whatever big spenders and VIPs happen to be in Vegas that weekend - its a showing off thing for people. It's almost like a private show that real fans don't have access to. At their ages, I think a Hotel California residency would be very appealing. Because they can claim this first show as "historic" maybe prices would go down if they did do additional shows - they won't be historic anymore.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Hi MaryC - How are you ? So good to hear from you. I have to say I pretty much agree with what you said. I can see them doing a residency. It would mean they would not have to do the touring all over the country, and have a base where they do maybe one show per month - like Billy Joel at the Garden. I had read somewhere that Glenn was talking about doing something like this at the Form in LA before he passed.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FreyFollower
Remember when there was little or no difference in seat prices? Dedicated fans of modest means could get front row seats if they were willing to camp overnight in front of the box office.
These prices are well above what you would expect for some charity fund raiser---at least then you could feel good about supporting a worthy cause.
I wonder if they are so far removed from the average Joe that they don't realize that these ticket prices are insultingly unattainable for the majority of their long time fans, many whom are retired at this point. And all the fancy hoo-haws added on just make them more expensive.
To put the prices in perspective, the average household income for Linden, where Henley is from, is less than $26,000 a year. As GA implied, rich folks who hardly know them will be the ones out front. And paying that much money doesn't insure that there won't be sound issues, hoarse singers, or obnoxious drunks seated all around you, either!
FF - Agree ! Like I said before - pure greed. :thumbsdown::enraged::sad:
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
longtimeeaglesfan
Floor seats in the 11th row are over $907 each after fees. The Lane One packages range from $2,100 each (ticket only in 3rd or 4th row side floor sections) to $7,500 each for front row-center, but includes hotel, some food & drink and transportation extras.
The worst nose bleed seats are $164 plus fees!
Maybe I’m not doing something right in looking it up, but it looks like the Platinum Experience ($6500) is the only Lane One package left for the Friday concert. Only the top 2, Diamond ($7500) and Platinum packages, are available for Saturday. The Gold, Silver and Premium Experiences have sold out I guess.
To compare, The Rolling Stones have a meet and greet package that costs $25,000 per person. Elton John is charging $9075 per person for a backstage tour and photo at his piano (without him) plus some extra goodies, but no meet and greet. Neither of these include accommodations in a luxury suite at a 4-5 star hotel. There are other bands who are charging ridiculous prices for VIP experiences as well. Just sayin, the Eagles are hardly alone in this.
Based on the info from the previous post, it appears much of the Linden population have been priced out of Eagles concerts for decades.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
[QUOTE=Delilah;38475Based on the info from the previous post, it appears much of the Linden population have been priced out of Eagles concerts for decades.[/QUOTE]
Well, tickets to their last show in Bossier City, a very reasonable distance from Linden, started at $45! (As reported from The Shreveport Times.). Not exactly Vegas, but fairly affordable.
Granted, ticket prices for big name acts of late have gone crazy.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
No, the "Eagles" are not alone.
I think there may have been some who believed they held themselves to a higher standard.
Those people are being disabused of that notion.
It's a painful process.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Although I know this topic is not what was being referred to, the "Because we can" comment frequently comes to mind.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
I agree with Soda and FreyFollower completely.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Yep - I agree that those Vegas prices are obscene. I've said this before, and I'll say it again ... I don't believe their touring over the past two years has been quite as lucrative as they had hoped. So, yeah, let's save face, and do these Vegas shows. After all, it is more money and less effort for them, even though the average fan is priced out of these shows. But, oh, I forgot, the band isn't doing this for the money ... they are doing it because the fans still want to hear these songs. :brickwall:
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Yes, if the fee is right, they keep the songs alive. 👌
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ive always been a dreamer
Yep - I agree that those Vegas prices are obscene. I've said this before, and I'll say it again ... I don't believe their touring over the past two years has been quite as lucrative as they had hoped. So, yeah, let's save face, and do these Vegas shows. After all, it is more money and less effort for them, even though the average fan is priced out of these shows. But, oh, I forgot, the band isn't doing this for the money ... they are doing it because the fans still want to hear these songs. :brickwall:
Exactly. It's all about the $ and anyone who says that its for healing or for keeping the music alive or any of that nonsense is choosing to deny the reality of it all, IMO. It's so obvious by now.
I also agree that I don't think they've been all that successful without Glenn.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chaim
Yes, if the fee is right, they keep the songs alive. 👌
Bingo!
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FreyFollower
Well, tickets to their last show in Bossier City, a very reasonable distance from Linden, started at $45! (As reported from The Shreveport Times.). Not exactly Vegas, but fairly affordable.
Granted, ticket prices for big name acts of late have gone crazy.
Good point, FF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ive always been a dreamer
Yep - I agree that those Vegas prices are obscene. I've said this before, and I'll say it again ... I don't believe their touring over the past two years has been quite as lucrative as they had hoped. So, yeah, let's save face, and do these Vegas shows. After all, it is more money and less effort for them, even though the average fan is priced out of these shows. But, oh, I forgot, the band isn't doing this for the money ... they are doing it because the fans still want to hear these songs. :brickwall:
Dreamer, what are you basing this on? From everything I’ve read, the tour has been quite successful. I don’t know how the European dates are selling but they sold out concerts in Australia and New Zealand last month. They actually grossed $6.6 million+ in one night at Dunedin, NZ. The planning for the Vegas shows must have started some time ago.
According to Pollstar, the band was ranked the #6 top-grossing act for 2018, ahead of U2 and The Rolling Stones:
Rounding out the Top 10 are Bruno Mars, Eagles, Justin Timberlake, Roger Waters, U2 and The Rolling Stones. The Eagles’ sixth-ranked tour took in $165.9 million at the box office from 964,245 sold tickets at 53 performances – followed by Timberlake at No. 7 who, after a postponement of shows until 2019 because of health reasons, ended the year with 77 shows reported and $150.8 million in earnings from 1.1 million tickets.
https://www.pollstar.com/article/yea...on-2018-136923
They are also nominated for a Best Rock Tour Award by Pollstar.
https://awards.pollstar.live/2019-nominees/
I believe it’s possible for a band to perform for the money, the adulation from the audience and because they just love playing music.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
I agree with Delilah completely. Their high prices are hardly unique. They are definitely high. They might be excessive depending on your view but that’s a personal opinion thing. For me personally, they are one of the most popular bands of all time and I think their prices reflect that. Also, To me these guys picked music because they loved it not because of money. Don’t get me wrong, at this point in their lives money plays a huge role but I think they still like what they do. If they folded the Eagles after Glenn’s passing, I believe they would still be touring and playing many of these songs (in their respective solo careers). I don’t deny the impact of money on their decisions but I think there’s a number of factors that cause them to tour. Not just the money.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
YoungEaglesFan
If they folded the Eagles after Glenn’s passing, I believe they would still be touring and playing many of these songs (in their respective solo careers).
Which is exactly what they should have done, YEF! No Eagles without Glenn. They have the right to be Don Henley, Joe Walsh, and Timothy B. Schmit. Not Eagles!
To be charging this much to see a heavily diluted Eagles is just shameful, IMO.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Maybe they do love to play still and love the adulation, but they have other avenues for that (solo, or even together under a different name without doing Glenn's material).
There is no doubt that money is what drove them to continue after Glenn's passing, not for the love of it or healing or any of that stuff.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WalshFan88
Maybe they do love to play still and love the adulation, but they have other avenues for that (solo, or even together under a different name without doing Glenn's material).
There is no doubt that money is what drove them to continue after Glenn's passing, not for the love of it or healing or any of that stuff.
I agree with everything you said. They do straddle a weird position with them saying publicly that the band isn’t the same without Glenn and that it’s not really the Eagles but at the same time touring as the Eagles.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WalshFan88
Which is exactly what they should have done, YEF! No Eagles without Glenn. They have the right to be Don Henley, Joe Walsh, and Timothy B. Schmit. Not Eagles!
To be charging this much to see a heavily diluted Eagles is just shameful, IMO.
I wouldn’t be opposed to that though I just personally believe that it’s legitimate band lineup. I wonder how much simplicity of them touring together played a role. Kinda hard to advertise that lineup. Unless they formed a new band...
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
YoungEaglesFan
I agree with everything you said. They do straddle a weird position with them saying publicly that the band isn’t the same without Glenn and that it’s not really the Eagles but at the same time touring as the Eagles.
To me I'd probably have more respect for them at this point if they just came out and said the facts. I'd still be opposed to them moving on, but I'd feel like they aren't being as deceitful.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
YoungEaglesFan
I wouldn’t be opposed to that though I just personally believe that it’s legitimate band lineup. I wonder how much simplicity of them touring together played a role. Kinda hard to advertise that lineup. Unless they formed a new band...
Oh I definitely think they should have formed a new band.
To perform Hotel California with only 2 original members and charge the prices they are charging is just asinine.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Delilah
Good point, FF.
Dreamer, what are you basing this on? From everything I’ve read, the tour has been quite successful. I don’t know how the European dates are selling but they sold out concerts in Australia and New Zealand last month. They actually grossed $6.6 million+ in one night at Dunedin, NZ. The planning for the Vegas shows must have started some time ago.
According to Pollstar, the band was ranked the #6 top-grossing act for 2018, ahead of U2 and The Rolling Stones:
Rounding out the Top 10 are Bruno Mars, Eagles, Justin Timberlake, Roger Waters, U2 and The Rolling Stones. The Eagles’ sixth-ranked tour took in $165.9 million at the box office from 964,245 sold tickets at 53 performances – followed by Timberlake at No. 7 who, after a postponement of shows until 2019 because of health reasons, ended the year with 77 shows reported and $150.8 million in earnings from 1.1 million tickets.
https://www.pollstar.com/article/yea...on-2018-136923
They are also nominated for a Best Rock Tour Award by Pollstar.
https://awards.pollstar.live/2019-nominees/
I believe it’s possible for a band to perform for the money, the adulation from the audience
and because they just love playing music.
Delilah - I didn't say that the tour wasn't successful. As a matter of fact, I think most bands would give anything to be half as successful. However, in comparison to past Eagles tours, I do not believe this one has been as lucrative. The numbers you gave actually make my point. In past years when they toured, the band almost always ranked 1st or 2nd in earnings. Now, you can make an argument that they aren't bringing in the same $$'s because they aren't playing as many dates. However, I would argue back that the reason they aren't playing as many dates is because they have reached their market saturation point where they schedule as many dates as the demand will bear.
And at the risk of repeating myself once again, I don't doubt that they love playing music and I have no problem with them making money for their performances. However, they had many other options to continue performing without continuing as the Eagles. It would seem to me that it would have been much more of an artistic challenge for them to explore other avenues such as collaborating with other artists or focusing on their solo careers.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ive always been a dreamer
Delilah - I didn't say that the tour wasn't successful. As a matter of fact, I think most bands would give anything to be half as successful. However, in comparison to past Eagles tours, I do not believe this one has been as lucrative. The numbers you gave actually make my point. In past years when they toured, the band almost always ranked 1st or 2nd in earnings. Now, you can make an argument that they aren't bringing in the same $$'s because they aren't playing as many dates. However, I would argue back that the reason they aren't playing as many dates is because they have reached their market saturation point where they schedule as many dates as the demand will bear.
Ok, but in your previous post you said the tour hadn’t been as lucrative as they had hoped. I don’t believe any of us can know what financial goal they were hoping for, unless I missed some quote by Don or Irving. Why would they even expect to do as well as previous tours with Glenn? My guess is they are pleased and probably surprised they have been doing as well as they are, all things being considered.
Also so you said they were doing the Vegas shows to “save face” as if their tour numbers were embarrassing. I doubt the public or the number-crunchers or whoever care that much, if at all, that they were #6 last year vs. #1 or#2 in 1996 (or whenever it was).
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ive always been a dreamer
Delilah - I didn't say that the tour wasn't successful. As a matter of fact, I think most bands would give anything to be half as successful. However, in comparison to past Eagles tours, I do not believe this one has been as lucrative. The numbers you gave actually make my point. In past years when they toured, the band almost always ranked 1st or 2nd in earnings. Now, you can make an argument that they aren't bringing in the same $$'s because they aren't playing as many dates. However, I would argue back that the reason they aren't playing as many dates is because they have reached their market saturation point where they schedule as many dates as the demand will bear.
And at the risk of repeating myself once again, I don't doubt that they love playing music and I have no problem with them making money for their performances. However, they had many other options to continue performing without continuing as the Eagles. It would seem to me that it would have been much more of an artistic challenge for them to explore other avenues such as collaborating with other artists or focusing on their solo careers.
Agreed.
They don't have as high grossing of a tour without Glenn. As it should be.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
@ Delilah - Obviously, we don't know exactly what the band thinks. We are both guessing, so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. My opinion is that they do care about the numbers. I don't have the year-by-year numbers, but, IIRC, they consistently came in 1st or 2nd in earnings throughout both the LROOE and HOTE tours.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ive always been a dreamer
@ Delilah - Obviously, we don't know exactly what the band thinks. We are both guessing, so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. My opinion is that they do care about the numbers. I don't have the year-by-year numbers, but, IIRC, they consistently came in 1st or 2nd in earnings throughout both the LROOE and HOTE tours.
Yep. It wasn't just in 1996. It was as recent as the HOTE tour.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
The subject of lucrative tours piqued my curiosity so I looked at some Pollstar data and discovered some surprising revelations.
These appear to be the most lucrative years for the band in terms of concert revenue:
1995 rank: #1; earnings: $63.3 million, $104,298,380 in 2018 dollars
2003 rank: #3; earnings: $69.3 million, $94,574,539 in 2018 dollars
2005 rank: #4; earnings: $78.4 million, $100,802,810 in 2018 dollars
2008 rank: #3; earnings: $73.4 million, $85,606,117 in 2018 dollars
2014 rank: #8; earnings: $86.5 million, $91,750,900 in 2018 dollars
2018 rank: #6; earnings: $165,900,000
Some notes:
- I saw no year other than 1995 where the Eagles ranked #1 for concert revenue and none where they ranked #2.
- in 2005 the average ticket price was $107.99; in 2014 it was $138.34; in 2018 $172.13
- although the band ranked #3 in 2008, it was actually a relatively low-grossing year for them, probably due in part to the economy at the time. This could go a long way in explaining why they eventually dropped LROOE songs from the setlist—it was affecting their bottom line.
- in 2010 the band had to cancel some dates due to poor sales
- in 1995 the band played about 74 dates; in 2014 they played 61 dates; in 2018 they played 55 dates
- the band’s lower ranking over time can be explained at least in part due to the rise of new acts like Taylor Swift taking over; before then the rankings were dominated by 70s and 80s acts.
These are the numbers that came up when looking into concert revenue. If anyone believes these numbers are wrong then I welcome any corrections and sources for them. These results were not what I expected (although I knew one of the HFO years was exceptional).
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Wow - Those are very interesting numbers. I am positive that the numbers for some years during both the LROOE and HOTE tours had the band coming in 1st or 2nd place. Apparently, the numbers got re-adjusted for some reason. Go figure! In any event, it doesn't change my original premise that the Vegas shows are easy money for the band, relatively speaking. They price out the average fan and substantially weakens the argument that they continue touring because fans want to hear these songs by the band that recorded them. But, like I said in another thread, sadly, residencies seem to be the up and coming trend for successful musical acts these days.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Delilah - thanks for the research - you are better than me. However, I thought they came out in the top three from 1994 to 1996 for the HFO Tour.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ive always been a dreamer
I am positive that the numbers for some years during both the LROOE and HOTE tours had the band coming in 1st or 2nd place.
I'm with you on that, Dreamer!
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
New Kid In Town
Delilah - thanks for the research - you are better than me. However, I thought they came out in the top three from 1994 to 1996 for the HFO Tour.
You’re welcome, NKIT but no I am not. I’m just a nerd who likes to dabble in numbers, stats and facts. 🤓
The HFO tour was very successful; I didn’t include 1994 data b/c they ranked #3 in the list of top-grossing acts (The Rolling Stones were #1 and Pink Floyd were #2). But I probably should have since they did gross $79.4 million (or $134,533,710 in 2018 dollars). That was with the tour cut short due to Glenn’s illness plus it didn’t even start until late May. They didn’t rank in the top 20 for 1996 which isn’t really surprising given they only played 28 shows. It’s possible they came in the top 3 for that time period.
As far as these figures go, keep in mind that I’m comparing years to years, not tours to tours. I’m also using concert revenue for comparison purposes, not total earnings. Perhaps the Eagles came out ahead during the LROOE and HOTE tours in terms of total earnings b/c that would include revenue from album and DVD sales and the related merchandising, etc. However it would not be fair to compare those numbers to last year’s tour when there was no new album release or anything else like a documentary to bring attention to the concerts (I don’t count Anniversary re-issues).
At any rate I haven’t come across anything to substantiate the Eagles ranking #1 or #2 for the LROOE or the HOTE tours. Maybe someone else can find something. For the last 10 years acts like Bon Jovi, Madonna, U2, Taylor Swift and One Direction have been making the mega-buck$.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ive always been a dreamer
They price out the average fan and substantially weakens the argument that they continue touring because fans want to hear these songs by the band that recorded them.
Yeah. I never bought that line.
How about the oft-repeated argument that touring is the ONLY way to keep the music alive, and thus they must tour in order to ensure the Eagles music does not die? Let's take that to its logical conclusion. If music is only "kept alive" by being experienced in concert, it is dead for all those who cannot afford to attend such concerts. Thus, Eagles music is now dead to everyone but the rich.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sodascouts
Yeah. I never bought that line.
How about the oft-repeated argument that touring is the ONLY way to keep the music alive, and thus they must tour in order to ensure the Eagles music does not die? Let's take that to its logical conclusion. If music is only "kept alive" by being experienced in concert, it is dead for all those who cannot afford to attend such concerts. Thus, Eagles music is now dead to everyone but the rich.
Very good point.
It's bad enough they are continuing without Glenn. It's even worse to try to charge what they do without him (who I consider the most important member of the band, but one of two at any rate). It's pretty much the equivalent of rubbing alcohol in a wound. It's worse than salt, IMO. I think that argument about keeping the music alive is weak. It's just another attempt to try to justify this abomination of a band now.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WalshFan88
Very good point.
It's bad enough they are continuing without Glenn. It's even worse to try to charge what they do without him (who I consider the most important member of the band, but one of two at any rate). It's pretty much the equivalent of rubbing alcohol in a wound. It's worse than salt, IMO. I think that argument about keeping the music alive is weak. It's just another attempt to try to justify this abomination of a band now.
Remember, not only is the music being kept alive, it's actually kept alive by the band that recorded it. These guys recorded this album after all. 😁
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
It looks like the Saturday/Sept. 28 date is practically sold out. The Platinum package ($6500) is still available.
There are still a few dozen standard tickets left for the Friday date and lots of resales. The Platinum package is still available as well.
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Delilah
It looks like the Saturday/Sept. 28 date is practically sold out. The Platinum package ($6500) is still available.
There are still a few dozen standard tickets left for the Friday date and lots of resales. The Platinum package is still available as well.
So, ok, here's the plan: $6500.00 for a 9-song album, that's a tiny bit over $722.00 per song, off the original. 9 of us go together, throw in $723.00 apiece, and we can each use the seat for one of the songs. Can we make this happen, people? 😃
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chaim
Remember, not only is the music being kept alive, it's actually kept alive by the band that recorded it. These guys recorded this album after all. 😁
:lol::lol::lol:
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LuvTim
So, ok, here's the plan: $6500.00 for a 9-song album, that's a tiny bit over $722.00 per song, off the original. 9 of us go together, throw in $723.00 apiece, and we can each use the seat for one of the songs. Can we make this happen, people? 😃
Is this before or after the shared cruise room? ;)
-
Re: Eagles to perform Hotel California in its entirety
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CAinOH
Is this before or after the shared cruise room? ;)
I've got plans, BIG plans! :grin: