So true; with their ubiquitous presence on the radio, for example, they are literally the soundtrack to the lives of so many people.
Type: Posts; User: luna65
So true; with their ubiquitous presence on the radio, for example, they are literally the soundtrack to the lives of so many people.
Yes, that's why I chose the phrase "in most cases" because every situation is different. It's certainly obvious to most people that neither Don nor Glenn could use the brand name on their own.
I think for fans questions/debates of legitimacy are different than the actual considerations. If Axl Rose can get people to see a version of Guns n'Roses with only one original member, then I think...
I see this in fandom all the time - people refer to the version of Pink Floyd which existed from 1987-1995 as Faux Floyd because Roger Waters was no longer a member. Or the "No Jon, No Yes" movement...