MC, I also read the book before reading more than two posts on this thread. I had heard some of the interviews he'd done when promoting the book, so I wasn't totally in the dark about what to expect, but for me, I found it shocking. To someone that loved and respected the entire band, to read one of them saying the things that were said was jaw-dropping. I read the book in less than a day, and then I made the mistake of coming to this thread and posting my thoughts immediately, instead of letting it percolate for a day or two.
I think I said in here somewhere, if not I meant to, that I am not a fan of auto-biographies as a general rule. I can't remember ever reading one where I thought nearly as much of the author after reading it as I did before reading. As TK said, an auto-biography is supposed to be biased, it's supposed to be selfish. No one writes one and talks mostly about someone else. It's a story intended to give one viewpoint. How that's handled is usually dependent on a ghost writer and the editor, and they work for the publisher whose goal is to create sound-bites and sell books. It obviously works, how many new members (or even lurkers) have read bits and pieces of this divisive thread and then bought the book when they wouldn't have otherwise?