So, let me get this straight, you'd be ok with a band that would have "0" original members? Now that's bizarre. Yes, I feel I do know what's best. As a lifelong fan, I know that sometimes it's better to go out with a bang than a whimper. I think they've proven everything they needed to and it's time to retire and call it quits. Sometimes I don't think the whole "we need to keep the music alive" is needed. It can and will continue to speak for itself. It doesn't need to be in concert now. Gary Rossington is in bad health. I hate to say this, but he probably won't be with us much longer. He keeps having heart attacks and then bypass surgeries. I'd rather him enjoy his time remaining off the road with family than suffer through the grueling experience that touring entails. I also would rather them end their legacy on a positive note, not stopping because of Gary's sudden death. JMO.
As far as the Vince thing, I don't want Glenn to be replaced by anyone carbon copy or not. I just wonder why they picked him when there are many other voices that are way closer and better for that vocal style. There are tribute band singers out there that come very, very close to Glenn's voice. Just makes me wonder.
Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons recently said they want they want the band to continue after they are gone. I think it's a pretty vomit-inducing idea. If the principal songwriters aren't there, the leaders, etc then it's not KISS. They want their kids to take it over eventually. I'm sorry, but a band shouldn't be a family business. If they want to do music fine, but do their own. That's all I'm saying.
As far as calling Irving, he'd probably prefer that I don't call him, because if I get the man himself on the phone, I'm not going to hold back my thoughts on this.